|
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2009-02-24 17:57:00
Size: 512
Comment:
|
Size: 607
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| #pragma page-filename DEV/versions/14352691 Resolve the Great Reply-To Debate once and for all, by making Reply-To munging a per-subscriber preference. That is, Mailman would allow each subscriber to control whether, for each post that subscriber receives, Mailman sets Reply-to to the list or leaves Reply-to untouched. The default would be "untouched". |
#pragma page-filename DEV/versions/7602318 Resolve the Great Reply-To Debate once and for all, by making Reply-To munging a per-subscriber preference. That is, Mailman would allow each subscriber to control whether, for each post that subscriber receives, Mailman sets Reply-to to the list or leaves Reply-to untouched. The default would be "untouched". |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
| * http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html * http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml |
* [[http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html|http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html]] * [[http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml|http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml]] |
Resolve the Great Reply-To Debate once and for all, by making Reply-To munging a per-subscriber preference. That is, Mailman would allow each subscriber to control whether, for each post that subscriber receives, Mailman sets Reply-to to the list or leaves Reply-to untouched. The default would be "untouched".
The usual references on this topic: