⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2009-05-18 09:19:01
Size: 935
Comment:
|
Size: 936
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
#pragma page-filename DEV/versions/8683527 If where you write, "Main menu options will be ordered by usage frequency" to mean dynamic reorganization, I am concerned. I have found Microsoft's and Adobe's efforts to "streamline" their menus by hiding things that haven't been used recently and moving items to the top just after I get used to finding them elsewhere around to slow me down more often than it helps. |
#pragma page-filename DEV/versions/8683529 If where you write, "Main menu options will be ordered by usage frequency" you mean dynamic reorganization, I am concerned. I have found Microsoft's and Adobe's efforts to "streamline" their menus by hiding things that haven't been used recently and moving items to the top just after I get used to finding them elsewhere around to slow me down more often than it helps. |
If where you write, "Main menu options will be ordered by usage frequency" you mean dynamic reorganization, I am concerned. I have found Microsoft's and Adobe's efforts to "streamline" their menus by hiding things that haven't been used recently and moving items to the top just after I get used to finding them elsewhere around to slow me down more often than it helps.
Adding a short "frequent tasks" list \\ sort of like recently used files in Office would be dandy, too, so long as it's distinct from the main navigation structure. There is a real risk that dynamic reorganization will actually hinder users.
(Unimportant: Is there a special meaning for "wizzard" with two "z"s instead of the usual one? I tried Googling and found a couple references to musicians...)