⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2007-06-04 00:38:25
671
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0
|
← Revision 2 as of 2015-03-04 06:07:07 ⇥
674
un WikiName
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 6: | Line 6: |
That said, it may also be useful for Mailman to provide hooks to integrate various anti-spam solutions. The standard Pythonic anti-spam solution would be SpamBayes, but I think we should definitely do what we can to support others as well. | That said, it may also be useful for Mailman to provide hooks to integrate various anti-spam solutions. The standard Pythonic anti-spam solution would be !SpamBayes, but I think we should definitely do what we can to support others as well. |
The proper place for anti-spam integration is the MTA, not Mailman. If you want to improve what Mailman can do as a response to what the anti-spam software has done to the incoming messages, that's great – but that's not the same thing as integrating or providing hooks for an anti-spam solution.
That said, it may also be useful for Mailman to provide hooks to integrate various anti-spam solutions. The standard Pythonic anti-spam solution would be SpamBayes, but I think we should definitely do what we can to support others as well.